Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor in Arabic Language and Literature, University of Tehran

2 Assistant Professor in Persian Language and Literature, University of Shahid Chamran, Ahwaz

Abstract

Haft-Peykar (or Bahram-nameh) is the fourth Nizami’s verse composition in terms of time and one of his masterpieces besides his Khosrow and Shirin. Haft-Peykar consists of two general parts: the first part is about Bahram and his life and the second one is about the stories of his seven wives. The structure of the book makes it possible to be criticized through a formalistic approach. The character, in this approach, isn’t considered as a real human being, but a collection of actions, images and lingual symbols. The characters, in the stories of Haft-Peykar, lose their central position, in a way that it would be possible to analyze them regardless the context and upon their own [1]behavior. In this paper, Character, as a word, will be criticized through formalistic approach, and then as a narrative element.  Direct and indirect representation of characters and their sources in Haft-Peykar will be done in the frame of action, name and title, language, environment and external appearance.  



 

Keywords

منابع
آسابرگر، آرتور (1380)، روایت در فرهنگ عامیانه، رسانه و زندگی روزمرّه، ترجمة محمّدرضا لیراوی، تهران، سروش.
ریمامکاریک، ایرنا (1383)، دانش‌نامۀ نظریّه‌های ادبی معاصر، ترجمۀ مهران مهاجر و محمّد نبوی، تهران، آگاه.
شاملو، سعید (1370)،‌ مکتب‌ها و نظریه‌ها در روان‌شناسی، تهران، رشد.
مندنی‌پور، شهریار (1383)، کتاب ارواح شهرزاد، تهران، ققنوس.
نظامی، الیاس بن یوسف (1377)، هفت پیکر، تصحیح وحید دستگردی، به کوشش سعید حمیدیان، چاپ سوم، تهران، قطره.
Bakhtin, Michail (1981), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (eds. and Trans.) M. Holquist and C. Emerson (Austin: Texas UP).
Barthes, Roland (1975),Introduction to the Structural Analysis ofNarrative,New Literary History, 6:2.
Chatman, Seymour(1978): Story and Discourse ,New york : Cornell UP.
Culler, Jonathan(1975):Structuralist Poetics, london: Routledge and kegan.
Ferrara,Fernando(1974): Theory and Model for the structural Analysis of fiction, New Litterary History, 5:2.
Hawark, Trence(1997): Structuralism and Semiotics,  London: Routledge.
Jahn, Manfred:“Narratology”, www. uni-kolen. de/~ame02/PPP. htm, 2003, N2. 4.
James, Henry(1963): “Art of fiction,”in Harmond worth, selected Literay Criticism Penguin.
Mudrick, Marvin: “Character and Event in fiction” Yale Review, 50, (1961).
Rimmon-kenan, Shlomith(2002):Narrative Fiction, London and New York: Routledge.
Schelifer, Roland(1987): Gremas and the Nature of Meaning, London: Croom Helm.
Scholes, Robert(1975): Structuralism in Literature, New York: Yale UP.
Tomashovsky, Boris(1963): “Thematics”, in Lemon and Reis (eds. and Trans.) Russian Formalist Criticism, Lincoln: Nebraska UP.
Toolan, Michael(2001): Narative, London and New York: Routledge.
Weinshemier, Joel(1979): “Theory of character: Emma”, Poetics Today, 1:1-2.