Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 allametabatabaei university

2 allame tabatabai

Abstract

Language is one of the most essential tools for human communication, expressed through both written and oral forms. Persuading the audience through language is a deliberate effort in which the writer conveys messages using influential rhetorical techniques. Authors in various literary and historical texts employ tools such as poetry, religious quotations, musicality of language, admonition, reverence, and exaggeration—depending on the contextual framework—to persuade their audience. Farhād Mīrzā Mo‘tamad al-Dawla, a notable statesman and man of letters during the reign of Nāṣer al-Dīn Shāh Qājār, makes extensive use of rhetorical strategies in many of his writings, particularly in his letters addressed to eminent figures and officials of his time. His Manshaʾāt consists of 47 historical and literary letters composed in both ornate and occasionally plain styles, addressing a variety of themes such as recounting events, administrative reports, grievances, and requests. The writer, depending on the context of the letter and the status and authority of the recipient, employs different rhetorical devices. This study examines the 47 letters using both qualitative and quantitative methods. One of the key findings is that the technique of “intertextual citation of poetry and sacred texts” holds the highest frequency across all contexts—especially in political letters and those addressed to dignitaries—indicating the author’s effort to construct rhetorical authority through intertextuality. Additionally, the frequent use of admonition and indirect warnings in political letters reflects strategies of persuasion embedded within power structures. In contrast, in personal correspondence, strategies such as reverence and self-deprecation are most prevalent, reflecting the role of emotional politeness and face management in interpersonal relations.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
Quran
Abidinia, Mohammadamir & Abdolalipour, Sho’le (2016). “A Reflection on Jami’s Monsha’at.” 11th International Conference on Promotion of Persian Language and Literature. University of Gilan. [in Persian].
Arianpur, Yahya (1993). Az Saba ta Nima, Vol. 1. Tehran: Zowar. [in Persian].
Aristotle. (2013). Rhetoric (Trans. Esmaeil Saadat). Tehran: Hermes Publishing. [in Persian].
Eshani, Tahereh (2023). “Rhetorical Techniques in Savanih al-Afkar (Correspondence of Rashidi).” Journal of Persian Language and Literature Research, No. 68, pp. 25–66. [in Persian].
Faghih Malek-Marzban, Nasrin & Saberi-Tabrizi, Zahra (2018). “Persuasion Techniques in Nafthat al-Masdur.” Persian Language and Literature Research Quarterly, No. 50, pp. 49–76. [in Persian].
Fotouhi Rudmajani, Mahmoud (2012). Stylistics: Theories, Approaches, and Methods. Tehran: Elmi Publications. [in Persian].
Gholamrezaei, Mohammad (2019). Detailed Stylistics of Persian Prose. Tehran: SAMT Publications. [in Persian].
Hafez, Shams al-Din Mohammad (2001). Hafez-Nameh, 2 vols., edited by Baha al-Din. 12th ed. Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi. [in Persian].
Hajji-Aqababaei, Mohammadreza (2022). Typology of Persian Prose in the Qajar Period. Tehran: Mehrandish Publications. [in Persian].
Heydari-Nia, Hadi; Laripour-Herat, Noushin; Paksaresht, Khadijeh (2017). “The Evolution of Monsha’at in Persian Literature.” 9th National Conference on Persian Language and Literature Research. [in Persian].
Ibn Khaldun, Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad (2012). Ibn Khaldun. Trans. Mohammad Parvin Gonabadi. Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi. [in Persian].
Jafarian, Zahra & Oskouei, Narges (2021). “Critical Stylistics of Asar al-Vozara.” Journal of Rhetorical and Linguistic Studies, No. 22, pp. 109–136. [in Persian].
Jahangard, Farank (2011). “Critical Approach as the Basis for the Transformation of Literary Prose in the Qajar Era.” Journal of Literary Criticism, Vol. 4, No. 15, pp. 61–86. [in Persian].
Majd, Omid & Gholami-Shabani, Shafagh (2018). “Methods of Audience Persuasion in Golestan of Saadi.” Persian Language and Literature Semiannual, Vol. 27, No. 28, pp. 179–193. [in Persian].
Mirazadi, Shiva (2013). “A Study of Persuasion Techniques and Argumentative Strategies in the Works of Saadi.” MA Thesis. Lorestan University, Faculty of Literature and Humanities. Advisor: Mohammadreza Hassani Jalilian. [in Persian].
Mo’tamedoddoleh, Farhad Mirza (1990). Monsha’at. Ed. Gholamreza Tabatabaei. 1st ed. Tehran: Elmi Publications. [in Persian].
Moezzeni, Ali-Mohammad & Ahmadi, Mohammad (2014). “An Introduction to the Role of Persuasion in Rhetoric and Literary Studies.” Journal of Literary Criticism and Rhetoric, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 11–93. [in Persian].
Molavi, Jalal al-Din Mohammad (2019). Masnavi Ma’navi. Tehran: Ettelaat. [in Persian].
Navab Safa, Esmail (1984). Biography of Farhad Mirza Mo’tamedoddoleh. Tehran: Zowar Publications. [in Persian].
Parsa, Seyyed Ahmad & Saeedi-Moghaddam, Mohammad (2017). “Nezami’s Persuasive Style in Didactic Themes (Focusing on Qasidas).” Journal of Didactic Literature Research, Vol. 9, No. 35, pp. 23–50. [in Persian].
Saadi Shirazi, Mosleh al-Din (1993). Bustan. Ed. Mohammad-Ali Foroughi. 4th ed. Tehran: Ghoghnoos. [in Persian].
Savaqeb, Jahanbakhsh & Mozaffari, Parastoo (2016). “Farhad Mirza Mo’tamedoddoleh’s Governance of Kurdistan and Its Consequences (1867–1874).” Historical Research Quarterly, Vol. 53, 9th Year, pp. 227–255. [in Persian].
Shaker, Mina (2018). “Audience Persuasion in Hadiqat al-Haqiqah through Argumentation with Verses and Hadiths.” Journal of Literary History, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 83–112. [in Persian].
Shamisa, Siros (2015). Ma’ani (Meanings). Tehran: Mitra Publications. [in Persian]