mahdi sadeghi; fazlollah rezaei ardani
Volume 13, Issue 2 , March 2024, , Pages 134-150
Abstract
The dialogue element is effective as a lever in explaining the content and content of the speech and is a platform for creating realities and highlighting the characters of the work. ...
Read More
The dialogue element is effective as a lever in explaining the content and content of the speech and is a platform for creating realities and highlighting the characters of the work. This research examines this element in the Ashurai dirge (controversy between the two holy shrines of Makkah and Karbala) by Gholamreza Moghar with a descriptive-analytical and testimonial method. The words, combinations and tone of the words during the speeches of the two shrines depict the incidents and events of the two lands in the horizontal axis of the word, but the words of the shrine of Karbala emphasize the nature and perspective of the Ashura incident by introducing the characters. The semantic nature of the theme and the content of the poem with the help of debate or two-way dialogue as the basic element and help of innovative crafts, moves the systematic framework of speech in the vertical axis towards a specific goal (Knowledge of the philosophy of Ashura) and the three main agents of the dialogue (the speaker, audience and message), are directed in a circular radius towards the horizon of Ashura philosophy. By using this element correctly, the poet puts the burden of creating and paying attention to the content of the events on the shoulders of this tool so that it can be removed from the text and made available to the reader. Finally, the rhetoric of the dialogue between the two shrines, by enhancing the linguistic and structural side of the poem as required by the prevailing context, takes a step towards crystallizing the hidden layers of the Karbala incident
